District Attorney - I Learned Something From A Tom Cruise Movie (Updated 3 Times)
Hi friends. Now, I found out about District Attorney - I Learned Something From A Tom Cruise Movie (Updated 3 Times). Which could be very helpful in my opinion therefore you. I Learned Something From A Tom Cruise Movie (Updated 3 Times)July 12th, 2006 4:15Pm California Time
What I said. It shouldn't be the actual final outcome that the actual about District Attorney. You check out this article for facts about what you need to know is District Attorney.District Attorney
I know, it's hard to believe, isn't it? I laughed at the title myself several times before ultimately acknowledging the truth of the matter.
What did I learn specifically? Well, it wasn't how to steal cheese, although thank you so much for the picture anonymous web user!
Image credit: [http://users.utu.fi/hajala/Mission] Impossible.jpg
What I learned, specifically from Mission Impossible (The 1st film, released in 1996), was the fate of an exposed Noc. A 'Noc' is an worker of the United States Government, working in a Non-Official Cover
status in the field of Espionage. The fate of a Noc upon being exposed, I learned in 'Mission Impossible' is an approximately assured assassination.
The crux of the whole film depended upon Ethan Hunt (A Noc played by Cruise)'s potential to keep a list of Nocs from being exposed. American espionage agents, both legal and non, both fictional and non, have many enemies that would like to see them dead.
'Oh, it's just a movie!' You might say. But in fact, Nocs are real, and their identity is Classified by the United States Congress.
Wikipedia on Nocs -(Non-Official Cover Operatives)
"The degree of sophistication put into nonofficial cover stories can vary considerably. Sometimes, an agent will plainly be appointed to a position in a well-established company which can contribute the acceptable opportunities. Other times, whole front associates can be established in order to contribute false identities for agents. Examples include Air America, used by the Cia while the Vietnam War, and made famed by the eponymous film. Another is Brewster Jennings & Associates, used by the Cia in Wmd investigations, and made famed by the Plame Affair. The use of front associates can be dangerous, however, as the exposure of a particular agent will expose the whole operation."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonofficial_cover
The topic of the day in American Politics has most obviously been the admission by Reporter Robert Novak that Karl Rove easily did apprise him of the identity of Valerie Plame, a Noc, and that he did knowingly print Valerie Plame's identity in his syndicated column.
Did Robert Novak break the law?
According to 50 Usc Sec. 435. Procedures (which is the law in question), 'No'. A reporter is not bound by the restrictions imposed upon an worker of the menagerial Branch. He did however commit Treason in this case, as this particular exposure of Classified information did measurable damage to the protection of our nation. (See Wikipedia Entry on Noc above)
Did Karl Rove break the law?
According to 50 Usc Sec. 435. Procedures (which is the law in question), 'Yes'. Mr Rove, as an worker of the current Bush Administration, is bound by the restrictions imposed upon a member of the menagerial branch not to relate Classified information to those without permissible authorization. He is added guilty of Treason in this case, as this particular exposure of Classified information did measurable damage to the protection of our nation. (See Wikipedia Entry on Noc above)
50 Usc Section 435 is a Federal Law, and is The law in query when attempting to reconcile acts of declassifying data. If there is a query as to whether or not a 'leak' was legal, 50 Usc Sec. 435 is where lawyers go to find out. It can be found here:
[http://frwebgate1.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WaisdocId=743412387478] 0 0 0&Waisaction=retrieve
It can also be found here:
http://www.washingtonwatchdog.org/documents/usc/ttl50/ch15/subchVi/sec435.html
Further, 50 Usc Sec. 435 is posted in word format in the sidebar for this page, so you can download it for your own use.
All Amendments and resulting menagerial Orders (which operate within but do not trump this law) are included at the above address. Also included within the law is a detailed outline of the legal process an menagerial branch legal must endure in order to legally declassify data. Anything who cares to speak to you about the legality of the Valerie Plame outing, who does not reference 50 Usc Section 435, should be questioned added before acceptance as a credible source.
This law was enacted by Congress on December 5th, 1991, well before Bush took office.
There has been some query recently among the group about the status of Valerie Plame's identity before it's publication by Novak and Judith Miller (Ny Times). To bring clarity to the situation,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cia_leak_grand_jury_investigation
In September 2003, the Cia requested that the Justice department investigate the inherent unauthorized disclosure of a Cia officer's classified identity, that officer being Plame. Wikipedia has detailed the whole investigation that followed the Cia's actions here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plame_affair#_note-32
President Bush has effortlessly admitted that Plame's status was easily classified, and when the investigation began he vowed to fire Anything involved in the 'leak' from his Administration.
George W. Bush - June 10, 2004 (Responding to a media query which asked "do you stand by your pledge to fire Anything found to have . . . Leaked [Valerie Plame's] name?"): "Yes. And that's up to the U.S. Attorney to find the facts."
George W. Bush - July 18, 2005: "I would like this to end as quickly as inherent so we know the facts. And if someone committed a crime, they will no longer work in my administration."
George W. Bush - September 30, 2003: " And if there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is. And if the someone has violated law, the someone will be taken care of. ... I don't know of anyone in my management who leaked classified information. If somebody did leak classified information, I'd like to know it, and we'll take the acceptable action."
Bush's Press Secretary, Scott McClellan affirmed these statements repeatedly:
Scott McClellan - September 29, 2003: "The President has set high standards, the top of standards for citizen in his administration. He's made it very clear to citizen in his management that he expects them to adhere to the top standards of conduct. If Anything in this management was involved in it, they would no longer be in this administration."
Scott McClellan - October 7, 2003: "Let me riposte what the President has said. I speak for the President and I'll talk to you about what he wants." and "If someone leaked classified information, the President wants to know. If someone in this management leaked classified information, they will no longer be a part of this administration, because that's not the way this White House operates, that's not the way this President expects citizen in his management to conduct their business." -source: Wikipedia.org
To summarize thus far, 50 Usc Section 435 states that menagerial branch employees and officials must declassify data in a manner consistent with the outlined format within said law. The manner of the leak was not consistent with this law, implicating the leakers as guilty of violating 50 Usc Sec 435. This information should plainly beget indictments pursuant to this law. The leakers are now (as of June 12th, 2006) known in the group forum to be along with but not diminutive to: Karl Rove, Lewis 'Scooter' Libby, and Dick Armitage. President Bush and Dick Cheney have admitted publicly to authorizing the leak, along with them in this violation. Their claim of menagerial Privilege does not exempt them from laws specifically written to curtail the powers of the menagerial Branch.
Further, this particular act of illegal declassification was detrimental to the protection of the United States of America. This leak exposed a Cia front company, Brewster Jennings, and every operative both domestic and abroad working within that front to manufacture solid brain on the nuclear capabilities of Iran.
An act of this nature is otherwise known as 'Treason'.
According to my source of option for this article, Wikipedia:
"In law, treason is the crime of disloyalty to one's nation or state. A someone who betrays the nation of their citizenship and/or reneges on an oath of loyalty and in some way willfully cooperates with an enemy, is determined to be a traitor."
The Constitution tells us exactly what to do with those guilty of Treason who are employed within the menagerial Branch:
Section. 4. The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
The whole document can be found here:
[http://www.constitution.powersandmorrison.com]
All employees and officials of the menagerial branch are branch to the above cited section of the Constitution.
Okay, now that you have all of the facts, go take Another look at that hilarious mouse picture at the top of this article. And the next time someone tries to clarify to you that the President can do Anything he wants to, direct them to this page, and tell them that Tom Cruise easily knows something they don't.
(Update 1)
Breaking News - 7/13/06 4:51Pm California Time
On the heels of this investigation, and the distribution of the results to the mainstream media and affiliated legal parties, it is my delight to announce that Valerie Plame Wilson, and her husband Joseph Wilson have filed suit in U.S. District Court today.
'In a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court, Valerie Plame and her husband, Joseph Wilson, a old U.S. Ambassador, accused Cheney, Rove and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby of participating in a "whispering campaign" to relate Plame's Cia identity and punish Wilson for criticizing the Bush administration's motives in Iraq.' -(Ap)
Ap News Article:
[http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2189932]
Reuters Article:
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyId=2006-07-13T210506Z_01_N13360644_Rtrukoc_0_Us-Bush-Leak.xml
The distribution of the referenced law (50 Usc Sec. 435) occurred this afternoon via the following letter:
To Whom It May Concern:
Regarding the Valerie Plame Outing Investigations,
currently being conducted by special Counsel Patrick
Fitzgerald
This message has been sent to the following:
The Offices of Patrick Fitzgerald, special Counsel
The Offices of Robert Luskin, Attorney for Karl Rove
Joseph Wilson, fmr. U.S. Ambassador
Valerie Plame-Wilson
Christopher Wolf, Attorney for Valerie Plame-Wilson
Air America Radio
Msnbc
Cnn
The Ny Times
The Washington Post
The La Times
The Chicago Tribune
The Sf Chronicle
Attn: The Law Pertaining To The Declassification of
Classified Information, and the Processes Required to
Effect Such, Has Been settled By Nathan Morrison of
Powers&Morrison ([http://www.powersandmorrison.com]).
This law, 50 Usc Sec. 435, has been made available to
the mainstream media at large in it's entirety. All
relevant legal parties have been informed.
The original article, detailing the publish of this
information at P&M, is here:
[http://www.LibertyInChaos.PowersAndMorrison.com]
The report is titled: "I Learned Something From A Tom
Cruise Movie", and is settled at the top of that page.
The law (50Usc Sec. 435) is also available at this page
in .txt format for your uses. It is also posted below
for convenience.
For added information, please contact:
Nathan Morrison
Morrison@PowersAndMorrison.com
Thank you for your time.
(Update 2)
July 13th, 2006 6:30Pm California Time
Breaking News -- Exclusive to Powers&Morrison.com
Joseph Wilson and Valerie Plame will be holding a Press argument tomorrow morning, and explaining the lawsuit filed today (See update 1 below).
Tune in to your national news assistance of option Friday, Am Eastern Time. Your questions will be answered then.
Thank you readers for your reserve in getting the word out on this. Every person at P&M appreciates your sentiments, and your assistance in the struggle for justice for Valerie Plame.
(Update 3)
Breaking News - July 14th, 2006 11:22Am California Time
Valerie Plame Wilson and her husband Joseph Wilson gave a press argument this morning, detailing the suit they filed yesterday against Vice President Dick Cheney, Presidential Adviser Karl Rove, and Lewis Libby.
The Video of the Press Conference, provided by Cnn, is here:
http://www.cnn.com/video/politics/2006/07/14/sot.cia.leak.plame.wilson.cnn/content.html#
In unrelated news, I will be out of the office all next week. I will be receiving your emails at irregular intervals, so please forgive the delay in my response time. I will be posting intermittently while away.
I will return to my news desk on Monday, July 24th.
-Morrison
0 comments:
Post a Comment